Case Summary
Plaintiff Wang joined Defendant Xiamen Certain Trading Co., Ltd. as a Sales Supervisor on 2023/1/1. The parties entered into a written labor contract specifying a monthly base salary of 10000 yuan plus sales commissions, with wages paid monthly on the 15th day for the preceding month. Starting in 2023/10, Defendant began withholding Plaintiff's wages. As of 2024/3, Defendant had accumulated unpaid wages and sales commissions totaling 86000 yuan. Despite multiple demands by Plaintiff, Defendant delayed payment under various pretexts. On 2024/4/10, Plaintiff resigned due to the unpaid wages and filed a lawsuit seeking payment of the outstanding wages and commissions totaling 86000 yuan, as well as economic compensation for the delayed wages amounting to 21500 yuan.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that Defendant Xiamen [Name] Trading Co., Ltd. shall, within ten days from the effective date of this judgment, pay Plaintiff Wang the unpaid wages and sales commissions totaling 86000 yuan, along with economic compensation for unpaid wages of 21500 yuan, amounting to a total of 107500 yuan; Defendant shall bear all litigation costs in this case.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Dispute over double wage difference for failure to sign a labor contract by a technology company in Xiamen
The employer failed to execute a written labor contract with the employee. The employee sued for double wages, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeDispute over compensation for illegal termination of labor contract involving a trading company in Fujian
The company unilaterally terminated the employment contract without legal justification. The employee sued for compensation for unlawful termination, and the court ruled in favor of the employee.
Labor DisputeOvertime Pay Dispute Case Involving a Manufacturing Company in Xiamen
The company failed to fully pay overtime wages to the employee. The employee sued for the unpaid overtime, and the court ruled in their favor.
