Fitness Service Company in Xiamen vs. Member Services Contract Dispute
Case Summary
Plaintiffs Li and 126 other members of a fitness center in Xiamen signed a "Fitness Service Contract" with Defendant Xiamen Fitness Service Co., Ltd. to purchase gym memberships and personal training sessions of varying durations, totaling {10,000 yuan. During the contract period, the Defendant unilaterally closed its fitness center in Siming District, Xiamen without prior notice to members or provision of alternative facilities, rendering the memberships and training sessions unusable. The Plaintiffs filed suit seeking refunds for unused fees and training sessions, as well as liquidated damages.
Key Dispute
Case Strategy
Processing Result
The court ruled that the defendant shall refund to the plaintiff and 126 other members a total of {10,000 yuan in remaining gym membership fees and personal training session fees, plus interest calculated on each member's remaining balance at the Loan Prime Rate published by the National Interbank Funding Center from the date the store closed until the date of full payment. The defendant shall bear all litigation costs and preservation fees for this case.
Encountering a similar legal issue?
Free AI case analysis: Get professional legal advice in 30 seconds to evaluate your case's chances of success and risks.
Recommended Related Cases
Sales and purchase contract dispute between a technology company in Xiamen and its supplier
The supplier failed to deliver customized equipment on time, delaying the tech company's production line launch. The court ruled that the supplier must compensate for all economic losses.
Commercial DisputesFranchise Contract Dispute Between a Catering Company in Fujian and a Franchisee
The franchisee used raw materials not designated by the franchisor without authorization, breaching the franchise agreement. The court ruled that the franchisee is liable for breach of contract, and the franchisor has the right to terminate the agreement.
Commercial DisputesConstruction Contract Dispute Case Between a Xiamen Construction Company and the Project Owner
The employer refused to pay the construction contract price, citing quality issues. After judicial appraisal confirmed the work met quality standards, the court ruled that the employer must pay the full outstanding amount plus overdue interest.
